|
The Quest for Shakespeare | 
enlarge | Author: Joseph Pearce Publisher: Ignatius Press Category: Book
List Price: $19.95 Buy New: $11.99 You Save: $7.96 (40%)
New (24) Used (4) from $11.49
Avg. Customer Rating: 7 reviews Sales Rank: 35766
Media: Hardcover Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 216 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1 Dimensions (in): 9.1 x 6.3 x 1.2
ISBN: 1586172247 Dewey Decimal Number: 200 EAN: 9781586172244 ASIN: 1586172247
Publication Date: April 2008 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Brand New, Perfect Condition, Please allow 4-14 business days for delivery. 100% Money Back Guarantee, Over 1,000,000 customers served.
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Book Description Highly regarded and best-selling literary writer and teacher, Joseph Pearce presents a stimulating and vivid biography of the world's most revered writer that is sure to be controversial. Unabashedly provocative, with scholarship, insight and keen observation, Pearce strives to separate historical fact from fiction about the beloved Bard. Shakespeare is not only one of the greatest figures in human history, he is also one of the most controversial and one of the most elusive. He is famous and yet almost unknown. Who was he? What were his beliefs? Can we really understand his plays and his poetry if we don't know the man who wrote them? These are some of the questions that are asked and answered in this gripping and engaging study of the world's greatest ever poet. The Quest for Shakespeare claims that books about the Bard have got him totally wrong. They misread the man and misread the work. The true Shakespeare has eluded the grasp of the critics. Dealing with the facts of Shakespeare's life and times, Pearce's quest leads to the inescapable conclusion that Shakespeare was a believing Catholic living in very anti-Catholic times. Many of his friends and family were persecuted, and even executed, for their Catholic faith. And yet he seems to have avoided any notable persecution himself. How did he do this? How did he respond to the persecution of his friends and family? What did he say about the dreadful and intolerant times in which he found himself? The Quest for Shakespeare answers these questions in ways that will enlighten and astonish those who love Shakespeare's work, and that will shock and outrage many of his critics. This book is full of surprises for beginner and expert alike. "Joseph Pearce writes piercingly brilliant books. This is one of them. He usually writes dramatic biographies. This is not one of them. It is not a biography and it is the least dramatic book he has written. But it is also the most important one. To see its importance, try the following thought-experiment. Imagine a book that convincingly proved that Homer was a Jew, or that Milton was a lapsed Catholic, or that Dante was a proto-Protestant. The idea would have far-ranging consequences. It would cast a new light on everything we knew about Homer, or Milton, or Dante. In his next book Pearce will trace the consequences of Shakespeare's Catholicism in his plays. In this book, he proves it historically. I mean proves it. (Pearce would make a formidable lawyer.) The evidence is simply overwhelming." -- Peter Kreeft, Ph.D., Boston College, Author, Summa of the Summa "I've long suspected that there was a deep Catholic sensibility in the plays of Shakespeare -- an emphasis on man's powerlessness without grace, yet also an openness to the sacramentality of nature, and to the energetic work of dutiful yet often mistrusted or despised servants. Pearce shows that Shakespeare himself was such a dutiful servant, ever dutiful to the Queen, but to God first. He does not leap to conclusions, but builds a case that is meticulous, reasonable, and convincing." -- Anthony Esolen, Ph.D., Providence College Professor of Renaissance English "Joseph Pearce has brought together here a mass of material on the vexed question as to Shakespeare's religious affiliation -- a question which scholars have traditionally tried sedulously to ignore. But it is a question of more than merely neutral historic curiosity. Readers, I feel sure, will be quickly drawn in to the matter. Once again, we owe Mr. Pearce a great debt." -- Thomas Howard, Ph.D. Author, Dove Descending: T. S. Eliot's Four Quartets "What more is there to be said about William Shakespeare? Yet the supply of books on the great dramatist is never ending. Now, however, there is a new reason for this supply. The religion of Shakespeare, and specifically his Catholicism, is now recognized as a `hot topic' both in the academic and the publishing world. And now Joseph Pearce, long recognized as a brilliant writer on great English Catholics, has gone back in The Quest for Shakespeare to this greatest of English Catholics, showing precisely how his greatness consists in his hidden Catholicism. This is a book that bodes well to proving a literary masterpiece." -- Peter Milward, S.J. Author, Shakespeare the Papist "Pearce writes with historical insight on one hand and poetic imagination on the other. Perhaps our greatest living biographer, Pearce has the uncanny ability to get into the minds, hopes, fears, and motivations of his subjects." -- Bradley J. Birzer, Ph.D. Author, J. R. R. Tolkien's Sanctifying Myth "Practicing the best virtues of detective, lawyer, scholar, and storyteller, Joseph Pearce convincingly reconstructs the historical crucible which produced the world's greatest poet. His explication of how Shakespeare was shaped by realities of personal courage, political danger, and eternal sacramental love will unshutter long obscured lamps within the plays and poems for every reader." -- Gene Fendt, Ph.D., University of Nebraska, Author, Is Hamlet a Christian Drama?
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 2 more reviews...
quest for shakespeare July 1, 2008 1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Pearce gives a fine introduction to a growing field of study regarding the Catholic faith and the Bard.
Outstanding! June 16, 2008 1 out of 3 found this review helpful
I saw the author speak about this book at a recent conference: he is a true scholar, passionate, excited, honest and thorough. Blew me away. The book convinced me beyond doubt. Skeptics will always be around... but the case is very, very tight. Outstanding! Can't wait for his next volume on the plays themselves.
such stuff as dreams are made of June 14, 2008 5 out of 7 found this review helpful
Joseph Pearce has written the most delightful book on Shakespeare I've ever come across. First, because the man is truly a gifted writer and has a sense of humor. Second, because he quickly demolishes the many silly myths and weird theories around Shakespeare's life. He pokes gentle fun at the folks who think Elizabeth I wrote the plays, or Daniel Dafoe, or the Earl of Oxford. Next he puts those who want to use Shakespeare to make their own point about sex and religion in their ignoble places. Then he swiftly goes on to the gist of the book. Did Shakespeare in some form or fashion hang on to his Catholic faith in spite of the terrible persecution of the times?
By looking at the evidence Pearce says yes, probably. His father was a discrete but resolute Catholic, his daughter Susanna was also a recussant. He was married by an ordained priest and lived in a town that was known for being a center of hard headed Catholicism. Like William Byrd he was probably excruciatingly careful--- he'd seen relatives and friends jailed and or killed for being Catholic afterall.
Quest for Shakespeare is quick, clever and charming. I'm so glad I bought it.
Shakespeare In Time May 29, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This book details, in great numbers, a myriad of facts regarding WS's life and the record is indeed extraordinary. Others have written about the relationship between his Catholocism and his plays but this book gives us many of the branches and limbs that helped form the totality of his tree of life. The more I read about WS, his works and the difficult times he lived in, the more amazing his life and output become. I recommend this to any and all.
"The Play's The Thing" May 27, 2008 20 out of 27 found this review helpful
This book consists of three sections, an investigation into the religious allegiance of Shakespeare the man, a proposed theory for the best way to read his works, and an examination of "King Lear" in light of that theory. The first section, unfortunately, is too largely given over to a frankly tiresome rehashing of the conclusions of such recent journalists and scholars as Michael Wood, Peter Milward, Clare Asquith, and Mutschmann and Wentersdorf on Shakespeare and Catholicism. The evidence presented identifies Shakespeare's father and daughter clearly as recusant Catholics, but leaves Shakepeare's own position as a recusant Catholic pretty much a matter of likely supposition to the very end. Supposition, in fact, comes to play so heavy a part in this section of the book that one begins to suspect Pearce's wishes as much as anything else may be the father of his thoughts. Despite his welcome and pretty consistent qualifying, his tone in places resembles the too flat, eager certitude that used to distinguish the teaching style of grade school nuns. Still, I would call this the best part of the book. Pearce's skills as a historian, in my view, far outweigh his strengths later in the book as a literary critic.
Part Two, a proposal on how to read Shakespeare properly, while it convincingly rules the a-historical, post-modern relativists out of court, becomes itself equally preposterous in its claim that "if Shakespeare was a Catholic, or was greatly influenced by the Catholicism of his parents and the persecution that surrounded the practice of Catholicism in his day, it forces us to reread the plays in an entirely new light." This sounds like not much more than a publisher's blurb for Pearce's next book, which is already, I understand, in the planning stages. At the same time, Pearce himself recognizes "the perspective of tradition-oriented critics...[and] the evident clarity of moral vision that they had always perceived in the plays," so perhaps it's not yet necessary for us to toss the Shakespearean criticism of Maynard Mack, John Danby, David Bevington, or C.S.Lewis among others into the furnace after all. Pearce's suggested way of reading is to understand first an author's belief system so as better to discern what must necessarily be present in a specific literary work. Without denying the reality of an author grounded in history and beliefs, I submit that this procedure is to go about things just backwards. It is unfortunately a revival of what the New Critics rightly pilloried many years ago as the "intentional fallacy." They suggested as a much better mode of approach trying to render through close reading the highest possible justice to what the work itself demonstrably or implicitly contained, to be a reader on whom nothing was lost, rather than one so attuned to preconceptions about an author's belief system as to be in danger of reading things not actually present into a specific work of art, while perhaps simultaneously missing what is there.
Part Three, Pearce's reading of "King Lear" as an unlikely variant of the "divine comedy", in my view bypasses exactly what is essential and from a Christian perspective (Catholic, if you will) what in fact makes the tragedy shockingly and unbearably sad. Just as "Beowulf" is a pagan work retold by a Christian author, "Lear" is a work by a Christian author which is set is pre-Christian Britain. Cordelia and Edgar are what some learned Elizabethans would have identified ethically as "natural Christians." Theirs are the charitable works and "nature" upon which grace will later build. However important charitable human behavior is, though, the play argues that it alone is not enough finally to make our lives bearable in this world. What with its contradictory, disputable attitudes toward the gods, the world of "Lear" is a world desperately in need of an actual Redeemer, one who has yet to appear in human history. The play ends in unrelievable sadness, with the King, in an unrecognized prefiguring of the Pieta, holding the broken body of his virtuous child cradled in his arms. This shocking event is Shakespeare's own addition to the traditional tale - help comes by chance just moments too late to save Cordelia, and Lear experiences ultimate misery. If the heartbroken Lear dies of joy imagining his dead daughter is reviving, it's important to remember that he is mistaken in this assumption. In the pre-Christian world of the play, we are indeed the most miserable of creatures - the death of the wonderful Cordelia lacks any meaning deeper than misfortune nor provides any solid ground for patience in similar trials of affliction. If this is Catholic art after all, it is informed, I'd argue, by a much tougher vision than Joseph Pearce with his notion of a "divine comedy" oddly present in its ostensibly pagan world has recognized.
|
|
| Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |