| 
 enlarge | Author: Bjorn Lomborg
Publisher: Knopf
Category: Book
List Price: $21.00
Buy Used: $4.79
You Save: $16.21 (77%)
New (47) Used (46) Collectible (2) from $4.79
Avg. Customer Rating:  95 reviews
Sales Rank: 30913
Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 272
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8
Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 4.9 x 1.2
ISBN: 0307266923
Dewey Decimal Number: 363.73874
EAN: 9780307266927
ASIN: 0307266923
Publication Date: September 4, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: The book is in good condition and the pages are clean. Ships within 2 business days. All items guaranteed.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Convincing But Needs Paleontological Perspective July 23, 2008
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
In COOL IT, Professor Lomborg approaches the global warming controversy by admitting that global warming is real, may in fact be caused in part by recent human activity, but no, global warming is not the End Of Days as predicted by Al Gore. Lomborg takes the hydra-headed Green Peace monolith of global warming and analyzes it in ways that have caused some environmentalists to tag him and others of his ilk as climate deniers, the operative word "deniers" meant to resonate with those who seek to assail true Holocaust deniers. Lomborg suggests that recent attempts to reduce the amount of CO2 in the air as exemplified by the failure of the ratification of the 1997 Kyoto Protocols cannot work as hyped because the cost is too high and the benefit is too low. When I first began to read about Kyoto years ago, I believed the hype that we today are too selfish to reduce our standard of living so that our children and grandchildren can live on a planet with moderate, life-sustaining climate. It was only recently that I learned the United States had good reason to refuse to ratify Kyoto. Lomborg succintly summarizes these reasons as follows: (1) The cost to implement Kyoto would be so staggeringly high that no nation would willingly agree to subsidize the attempt. (2) The benefit would be so miniscule that given the cost of the buck, the "bang" is unacceptable. (3) Lomborg urges society to consider the novel idea that global warming might actually be good for many societies that would benefit from higher temperatures. and (4) there are more efficient ways to alleviate human suffering other than by tossing trillions of dollars down the financial black hole of a global warming that has been appropriated for political agendas by the left. Lomborg's conclusion that we need to focus on R & D as the key is a compelling one. I have a criticism that Lomborg might seek to address in future editions. His entire analysis is relentlessly optimistic only because he considers recent human history vis a vis global warming. What of global warming's very long history of plaguing life on earth over the last few hundred million years? In UNDER A GREEN SKY, Peter Ward considers how global warming has been the catalyst for several mass extinctions, the most severe of which concluded the Permian Period some 230 million years ago. Ward notes that the very oceans turned toxic, pumping noxious fumes into the air until the skies above became tinged with green. If Professor Lomborg were to consider the unhappy lot of the Permian reptiles, his thesis of optimism concerning global warming might then be more palatable. Still, COOL IT is required reading, if for no other reason than to counter the annoying Al Gore and his phony Pultizer.
 Cherry Picks Facts, Doesn't Understand the Science July 6, 2008
4 out of 19 found this review helpful
This book seemed reasonable until I started investigating what climate scientists think. For a more informed opinion, see Hell and High Water: Global Warming--the Solution and the Politics--and What We Should Do. Also, read Joseph Romm at ClimateProgress web site and for some real meat go to RealClimate web site. You can look up the actual web site addresses in Google.
 Thoughtful Action July 2, 2008
1 out of 5 found this review helpful
The author believes in Man-caused Global Warming. However, rather than reflectively go along with the majority of that group, he demonstrates that their course of action will do little to stem the warming.
He concludes that the better approach is to use the same (or less) amount of money to help people in the developing world. The overall increase in human welfare will then allow the people to adapt to the warmer world.
Excellent Book June 16, 2008
2 out of 7 found this review helpful
This book is very well thought out and documented. I totally enjoyed it...especially the fact that global warming will actually result in a net saving of lives rather than loss.
Also, I enjoyed the practical economic solutions such as not encouraging building near the seashore. Time to stop state and federal government flood (& wind) subsidies for expensive beach homes.
Excellent, insightful book June 13, 2008
3 out of 6 found this review helpful
I enjoyed this book so much I have ordered a number of copies to give friends and family. This guy truly cares about our world. Thankfully he is smart enough to take an honest, measured and very insightful look at the bigger picture of how we can help, rather than relying on misguided rhetoric. He is brave enough to tell the truth that our energies and money should be poured into initiatives that will have a positive effect that almost completely dwarfs the miniscule effect that CO2 focused policies can hope to achieve. I find his writing style eloquent, convincing and easy to read. He layers his arguments in a way that make a great deal of sense. I highly recommend this book.
|
|
|
